eISSN: 2500-7106 / ISSN: 0123-2576
Register
Login
Medicinay Laboratorio
2024, Volume: 28, Issue:3 : 23-29 doi: 10.36384/01232576.702
Research Article
A comparison of postoperative pain and duration of hospital stay between Lichtenstein’s repair and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia
Received
Aug. 10, 2024
Revised
Aug. 26, 2024
Accepted
Sept. 12, 2024
Published
Sept. 29, 2024
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. Two widely used techniques are the Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair and laparoscopic repair, which includes transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches. This study compares postoperative pain and duration of hospital stay between these techniques Materials and Method:This was a prospective clinical study to evaluate pain levels following the surgical repair of unilateral primary inguinal hernia. Overall, 132 patients were enrolled. The choice of surgical procedure was randomized, with the first 66 patients evaluated hospital, were operated through the open LC technique and the 30 following patients operated through the TAPP technique. The inclusion criteria were: age between 18-70 years Results :A comparative analysis was conducted on 132 patients undergoing either Lichtenstein’s repair or laparoscopic repair for inguinal hernia. The patients were divided into two groups, each consisting of 66 patients. Postoperative pain was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at different time intervals, and the duration of hospital stay was recorded Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair resulted in significantly lower postoperative pain scores and a shorter hospital stay compared to Lichtenstein’s repair, suggesting a potential advantage in terms of early recovery and patient comfort
Keywords
License
Copyright (c) Medicinay Laboratorio
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
Medicinay Laboratorio open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Recommended Articles
Impact of Severe Pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia on Fetomaternal Outcomes: A retrospective study
14-17
PDF
Lupus eritematoso sistémico
211-223
PDF
The role of the microbiology laboratory in clinical practice
295-296
PDF
Clinical judgment: key in the selection within the "diverse list" of laboratory tests in hemostasis
95-96
PDF
Medicinay Laboratorio journal thumbnail
Volume: 28, Issue:3
Citations
54 Views
99 Downloads
Share this article
Editora Médica Colombiana SA / Universidad de Antioquia
Certified Continuing Medical Education Program (PEMCC)
Email: submission@medicinaylaboratorio.com
Carrera 43C #5-33 Medellín, Colombia 050022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36384/issn.0123-2576
Open Access Publication
Magazone managed by Biteca